Not least are its ties to the Kremlin and the fact it is the world’s fourth largest company, with a capitalization of more than 0 billion. Six agreed: Jean Nouvel of Paris; Massimiliano Fuksas of Rome; the Swiss team of Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron; Rem Koolhaas of Rotterdam; RMJM London; and Daniel Libeskind, who of course designed the master plan for the World Trade Center site.“We live in the 21st century, not in the 18th,” he said. If you spoke of launching satellites in the 18th century you would have been accused of devil worship.” He compared the current criticism to that lodged against the construction of the Eiffel Tower in Paris in the late 19th century.
At the Academy of Arts, on the Neva embankment, the exhibition has drawn the curious to see models of the six proposals.
December 2, 2006 Architecture A Russian Skyscraper Plan Divides a Horizontal City By STEVEN LEE MYERS ST. 1 — Russia’s largest company, Gazprom, announced on Friday that it had chosen the architecture firm RMJM London to design this city’s tallest building, brushing aside arguments from preservationists and residents that the project — whoever the architect — would destroy the city’s architectural harmony.RMJM’s winning proposal includes a twisting glass tower that would anchor a business and residential center planned for a site on the Neva River opposite the Smolny Cathedral, one of the city’s most famous landmarks. Petersburg” akin to city landmarks including the Admiralty, St. “This new, modern project will give birth to a new mentality for St.Piotrovsky, has organized meetings of preservationists and architects to propose alternative sites.“Something the city needs is development,” Mr. Matviyenko, who has championed the new business center, with an estimated cost exceeding billion. Putin, a native of the city, has long supported efforts to relocate companies and government ministries to the city.Piotrovsky said in an interview in his museum office in the Winter Palace, which itself established acceptable height limits for most buildings here for decades, “but let’s not destroy the old city.”Gazprom, though, has certain advantages that make a skyscraper appear inevitable despite the public outcry. And like Peter the Great, the company turned to foreign, not Russian, architects, inviting seven to submit designs.From left: RMJM London; Studio Daniel Libeskind; Herzog & de Meuron Architekten Under the designs for Gazprom City, a business complex planned for St.
Petersburg, the main tower would soar higher than the city’s landmarks.Although few object to revitalizing the rundown area, some opponents noted that it was the site of a Swedish fort from the 17th century and therefore had archaeological significance.And while the site is seven miles from the very center of the city, they argue that Gazprom City’s main tower would be visible from almost any point, destroying what Aleksandr D.“It is absolutely not appropriate for the city,” he said.“But most likely they will build it regardless.”A worn factory — obscured by a giant panel announcing Gazprom’s project — now occupies the site.The Japanese architect Kisho Kurokawa, who was invited to serve as a member of the jury, read a two-page statement on Friday describing his vision for St.